Government interference practices in realizing industrial relations for worker welfare/laborers
Keywords:
government, industrial relations, workersAbstract
One dimension of the labor law system in Indonesia is industrial relations, so industrial relations are one of the national goals and objectives of labor law. The national goal is explicitly stated in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, namely, "every citizen has the right to work and a decent living for humanity." This is a reference for the state and all parties in realizing national goals in the labor sector. The normative objectives of labor law have a very noble value in realizing harmonious, dynamic, and just industrial relations. Industrial relations between employers and workers are based on partnership and family so that problems that arise can be resolved through deliberation to reach a consensus. Interaction between the government, employers and workers unions must continue to be built and fostered in its implementation by involving existing components. The role of the government as a policyholder is very much needed to maintain the balance of bargaining position between employers and workers in order to create a conducive work situation for the sake of business continuity and work continuity for workers so as to foster welfare for all parties.
Downloads
References
Didik J Rachibini, Economic Development and Human Resources, Gramedia Widiasarana, Indonesia, Jakarta, 2001, p. 83.
Nanik Trihastuti, Building Harmonious Industrial Relations in Indonesia, Journal of Business Law, Volume 32 Number 2, Business Law Development Foundation, 2013, page 127.
Cosmas Batubara, Industrial Relations , PPM, Buana Printing, 1st Printing, Jakarta, March 2019
Adjat Daradjat Kartawijaya, Industrial Relations “Comprehensive Approach -Inter Discipline- Theory - Policy - Practice” , Alfa Beta, Bandung, 2020j, page 20.
Hans Borkenst.et.al. Indonesian Workers and Their Right to Organize. Indoc Leiden Nedherlands, 1981, p. 65.
R. William Liddle, The Middle Class and the Legitimacy of the New Order , a response to Daniel S. Ley in Richard Tanter and Kenneth Young, Indonesian Middle Class Politics, LP3S, Jakarta, 1993, p. 52.
Sapta Dwikarna, Industrial Relations System in Indonesia Effectiveness of Implementation of Pancasila Industrial Relations Policy (Case Study at PT. Unilever Indonesia and Indofood) Social Science Thesis, PPs UI, Jakarta 1994, page 66.
Hans Thollen, Indonesia and The Rule of Law, Twenty Year of New Order Government , London, Frances Pinter Publisher, 1987, pp. 120-121, quoted by, MM Billah, p. 85.
Verdi R Hadiz, Dynamics of Economic and Political Power in Indonesia Post-Soeharto, LP3S, Jakarta, 2000, p. 19.
Payaman Simanjuntak, The Role of Trade Unions and the New Paradigm of Industrial Relations in Indonesia , HIPSMI, 2000, p. 81.
Asri Wijayanti, Post-Reform Employment Law , Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2009, page 57.
Imam Soepomo, Labor Law in the Field of Employment Relations, Jambatan, Jakarta, 1975, pp. 6-7
Ardana I Komang, and Ni Wayan Mujiati, and I Wayan Mudhiarta Utama, Human Resource Management, Graha Ilmu Yogyakarta, 2012, page 247 .
Sri Haryani, Industrial Relations in Indonesia , LPP AMP YPM, Jogjakarta, 2019, p. 121.
H. Zulkarnaen, Employment Law, Setya Library, Jakarta, 2021, p. 156.
WHJ Reynearts, and HG Negel Kerke, Arbeidesverhodigen, Theorie end Pratijk , (Leiden/Antverper HE Stefert Kroese BV, p. 32.
FX Aji Samekto, Legal Studies: Criticism of Modern Law, UNDIP Semarang, 2003, page 18.
Soejadi, Pancasila as a Source of Legal Order, Indonesia , Lukman Offset, Jogjakarta, 1999, p.88.
M. Marbun, Principles of State Administrative Law, Liberty, Jogjakarta, 1987, page 23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The international tax journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.