Resilience strategies of Algerian SMEs: A processual analysis of dynamic capabilities in an institutional voids context
Keywords:
Algerian SMEs, dynamic capabilities, institutional voids, effectuation, resilience strategyAbstract
This research examines how Algerian SMEs develop strategic capabilities in a context characterized by institutional voids and structural volatility. The research used a qualitative multiple-case study design to examine six SMEs through 22 semi-structured interviews and document analysis of 94 items and non-participant observation. The research study reveals three fresh strategic patterns, which show how informal dynamic capabilities function at a microscopic level. The research presents a method which unites effectuation with dynamic capabilities and non-market strategies for an under investigated field. The study investigates three core research areas, which include Algerian SMEs and their dynamic capabilities and institutional voids and effectuation and resilience strategy.
Downloads
References
1. Aït-Ali, A. (2022). Économie algérienne: les enjeux de la transition. . Alger: Casbah Éditions.
2. Anderson, A. R., Dodd, S. D., & Jack, S. L. (2010). Network practices and entrepreneurial growth. ,. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(2), pp. 121-133.
3. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. McGraw-Hill.
4. Arend, R. J., Sarooghi, H., & Burkemper, A. C. (2015). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Business Horizons,, 58(6), pp. 663-674.
5. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,, 17(1), pp. 99-120.
6. Boubakri, N., & Hamza, O. (2021). Business environment and investment decisions: Evidence from Algeria. Journal of African Business, 22(1), pp. 121-140.
7. Brush, C. G., Edelman, ,. L., Manolova, T., & Welter, F. (2019). A gendered look at entrepreneurship ecosystems. . Small Business Economics,, 53(2), pp. 393-408.
8. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), pp. 1-14.
9. Cai, L., Guo, R., & Fei, Y. (2017). Effectuation, exploration, and exploitation in international business. Journal of World Business, 52(5), pp. 702-714.
10. Chen, M. A. (2020). The informal economy: Recent trends, future directions. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy,, 30(1), pp. 27-35.
11. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.
12. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H., & White, R. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, pp. 522-537.
13. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. (2008). Transforming disadvantages into advantages: Developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), pp. 957-979.
14. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. . Free Press.
15. Davis, G. F., Morrill, C., Rao, H., & Soule, S. (2009). Introduction: Social movements in organizations and markets. Administrative Science Quarterly,, 54(3), pp. 389-394.
16. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp. 147-160.
17. Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), pp. 553-560.
18. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp. 532-550.
19. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal,, 21(10-11), pp. 1105-1121.
20. Felin, T., Foss , N., & Ployhart, R. (2015). The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), pp. 575-632.
21. Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5 ), pp. 1019-1051.
22. Fletcher, M., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2021). Sampling in qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. The Qualitative Report, 26(5), pp. 1415-1444.
23. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. . American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), pp. 481-510.
24. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Dans N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Sage Publications.
25. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. . Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp. 9-30.
26. Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal,, 43(3), pp. 249-267.
27. Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), pp. 602-611.
28. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4). pp. 41-51.
29. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., & Beck, T. (2005). Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How organizations respond to environmental change. Journal of Management,, 31(5), pp. 738-757.
30. Liedholm, C. (2002). Small firm dynamics: Evidence from Africa and Latin America. Small Business Economics,, 18(1-3), pp. 227-242.
31. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing,, 24(5), pp. 419-435.
32. Mellahi, K., Frynas, J., Sun, P., & Siegel, D. (2016). A review of the nonmarket strategy literature: Toward a multi-theoretical integration. Journal of Management, 42(1), pp. 143-173.
33. Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. (2016). Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1), pp. 3-22.
34. Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), pp. 934-948.
35. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
36. O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(3), pp. 185-206.
37. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. . Oxford University Press.
38. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
39. Saldana, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (éd. 4th ed.). Sage Publication.
40. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency . Academy of Management Review, 26(2), pp. 243-263.
41. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing.
42. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), pp. 1319-1350.
43. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp. 509-533.
44. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), pp. 171-180.
45. Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. . Organization Studies, 27(5), pp. 613-634.
46. Wu, L. Y. (2007). Entrepreneurial resources, dynamic capabilities and start-up performance of Taiwan's high-tech firms. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), pp. 549-555.
47. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (éd. 6th ed.). Sage Publications.
48. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), pp. 185-203.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The International tax journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
