The impact of smartphones on youth linguistic development an anthropological study of common technology words
Keywords:
Language, Artificial Intelligence, Linguistic Nurture, Language Anchorage, Linguistic Registers, Linguistic Anthropology, Texting, Linguistic Capital, Youth, CommunicationAbstract
background: This study attempts to understand the meanings of technological words from artificial intelligence applications and social networks circulating among young people in urban neighborhoods. It reveals anew linguistic capital with diverse connotations that has found its place in the daily dialogue of young people, whether in written messages on social networks or even in spoken colloquial language Technical words have transformed into circulating colloquial language, expressing identities and belongings. Research method: This study was based on the qualitative description of technological words in the discourse of young people. Through ethnographic observation Results: We are facing a new form of communication that depends on linguistic innovations sourced from artificial intelligence Conclusion: The impact of artificial intelligence on the language leads us to think about the relationship between youth and smartphones and their impact on forms of communication, which shows that artificial intelligence can have an impact on the identity of society.
Downloads
References
1. Pierre Achard. (1996). Sociology of Language. Translated by Dr. Abdel Wahab Tazo. Dar Mansourat Oueidat, pp. 14-17.
2. Mat Tayeb Ben Fa, and Dar Sheikh Ahmed Hosni. (2019). Language, Power, and Hegemony. Al-Dhad, 1(3).
3. References
4. Caron, A. H., & Caronia, L. (2005). 5. Language, interaction and culture among techno-adolescents. In Mobile Culture (1). Presses de l’Université de Montréal. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pum.10425
5. James Costa, and Greco Luca. (2021). Linguistic Anthropology. (halshs-, Editor) Language and Society, pp. 21-33.
6. Bourdieu, P. (2003). Language and Symbolic Power. Fayard Edition.
7. Oustinoff, M. (2018). Language, Language and Translation. Hermes (n80), 163-167. DOI 10.3917/herm.080.0163
8. M. Vuille. (2003). Consumer Society and Cultural Codes of Young People. The Speech of Young People (10), 4 Resonances.
9. Sourdot, M. (2003). The Dynamics of Young People's Language. The Speech of Young People (10), 4. Resonances
10. Cadic, J.-M. (2016). Imaginaries and Artificial Intelligence through a Transverse Approach. (P. d. Supérieur, Ed.) Societies, 1 (n° 131), 77 to 86. DOI 10.3917/soc.131.0077
11. V. Rialle. (1996). Artificial Intelligence and its Place in the Cognitive Sciences. Bulletin of the French Association for Artificial Intelligence 26, 8-12. Halté, P. (2020). Emoticons : du sens des affects aux stratégies conversationnelles. Communiquer 28, 19-33. https://doi.org/10.4000/communiquer.5921 https://journals.openedition.org/communiquer/5921
12. Grannan, C. (2022). https://www.britannica.com/story/whats-the-difference-between-emoji-and-emoticons. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The International tax journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


