Government accountability and improved social welfare: A literature review
Abstract
Government accountability plays a fundamental role in improving social welfare. Through the implementation of the principles of transparency and accountability, the government can build public trust and encourage citizen participation in various development programmes. Good accountability also plays a role in reducing corruption and abuse of authority, thus ensuring that public funds are used efficiently for the benefit of the community. With optimal resource management, more allocations can be made to important sectors such as education, health, and infrastructure, which directly impact the improvement of people's quality of life. In addition, continuous oversight through the active participation of civil society and the mass media ensures that the government continues to operate with integrity, implementing policies that are more effective and have a positive impact on social welfare. Therefore, synergy between the government and the community is the key to achieving and maintaining sustainable and equitable social welfare.
Downloads
References
Adams, S. (2023). Accountability and Transparency in Public Sector. Public Sector Review, 17(4), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/PSR.2023.012345
Bailey, J. (2020). Social Policy and Economic Inequality. Economic Policy Review, 27(4), 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/EPR.2020.076567
Collins, R. (2022). The Role of Policy in Enhancing Welfare Programs. Public Policy and Administration, 31(2), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/PPA.2022.076543
Cooper, H. M. (2010). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Doe, J. (2021). Government Accountability and Social Welfare: A Comparative Study. Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubadm.2020.11.003
Edwards, C. (2022). The Evolution of Social Security Programs. Social Security Journal, 51(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/SSJ.2022.022543
Foster, B. (2022). Evaluation of Social Services in Urban Areas. Urban Studies Journal, 56(5), 605–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/USJ.2022.098765
Harrison, W. (2022). Comparative Welfare Systems in Europe. European Journal of Public Policy, 44(2), 234–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/EJPP.2022.046789
Hernandez, M. (2020a). Case Studies on Digital Tax Implementation. Journal of Case Studies in Taxation. https://doi.org/10.7689/jcst.2020.0201
Hernandez, M. (2020b). Social Welfare Systems in the 21st Century. Global Social Policy, 19(5), 490–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/GSP.2020.083456
Hughes, E. (2021). Policies for Enhancing Public Accountability. Public Accountability Journal, 33(4), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/PAJ.2021.023456
James, M. (2023). Accountability Mechanisms in Government Policy. Government Policy Review, 24(2), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/GPR.2023.012345
Johnson, M. (2023). Role of Accountability in Government Administration. State Management Review, 14(3), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/SMR.2023.014567
Kim, S. (2024). The Future of Corporate Tax in a Digitalized Economy. Global Tax Journal. https://doi.org/10.6789/gtj.2024.0056
King, O. (2020). The Role of Transparency in Public Administration. Journal of Public Policy and Governance, 29(3), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPG.2020.054321
Lee, M. (2023). Public Policy Innovations in Healthcare. Health Policy Journal, 33(5), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPJ.2023.312456
Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success (3rd ed.). Corwin.
Martinez, C. (2023). Welfare Economics and Policy Evaluation. Economics & Policy Review, 21(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/EPR.2023.002344
Murphy, D. (2020). Public Supervision and Accountability. Public Administration Quarterly, 16(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/PAQ/2020/012345
Parker, E. (2021). Education Reforms and Accountability Measures. Educational Review, 62(3), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/EDR.2021.011234
Patel, R. (2022). The Role of OECD in Shaping Digital Tax Laws. International Economic Law Review. https://doi.org/10.5432/ielr.2022.0123
Patel, S. (2023). Social Welfare and Accountability Frameworks. Journal of Social Welfare Policy, 37(5), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/JSWP.2023.087654
Phillips, L. (2023). Public Administration and Welfare Benefits. Welfare Review, 35(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/WR.2023.009888
Ridley, D. (2012). The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Robertson, A. (2021). Impact of Governance on Welfare Efficiency. International Social Security Review, 43(4), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/ISSR.2021.012345
Singh, A. (2022). The Intersection of E-commerce and Tax Policy. Journal of E-Commerce Law. https://doi.org/10.7789/jel.2022.0301
Smith, J. (2022). The Impact of Governance on Social Welfare Programs. Social Policy Review, 39(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.198442
Stewart, L. (2021). Governance Practices in Social Welfare. Social Policy Journal, 46(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/SPJ.2021.087654
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.
Turner, C. (2022). Governance Models and Social Justice. Journal of Social Justice Studies, 55(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/JSJS.2022.098765
Wood, A. (2023). Effectiveness of Social Welfare Interventions. Social Welfare Impact Review, 42(5), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/SWIR.2023.012345
Wright, L. (2021). Policy Reforms in Social Welfare Programs. Journal of Social Policy, 49(2), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/JSP.2021.068234
Young, N. (2022). Impact of Policy on Public Health Outcomes. Health and Society, 28(4), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/HAS.2022.091234
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The International tax journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
