The principle of double degree of jurisdiction in Light of Criminal Procedure Law No. 25-14 as a guarantee of a fair trial

Authors

Keywords:

Double degree of jurisdiction, Rights of the accused, Court of First Instance for Felonies, Criminal Court of Appeal

Abstract

The Algerian criminal legislator has enshrined the principle of double degree of jurisdiction since 1966 with respect to misdemeanors and contraventions, unlike felonies, until the issuance of Law No. 17-07 (now repealed), followed by Law No. 25-14, which maintained this principle. Under the latter, the Criminal Court was replaced by the Court of First Instance for Felonies, which examines acts classified as felonies at first instance, and a Criminal Court of Appeal was established as a second degree of jurisdiction. Prior to the 2017 amendment, limiting felony cases to a single degree of litigation was based on two main ideas. First, that judicial investigation was conducted on two levels: initially by the investigating judge, and subsequently by the Indictment Chamber, which was mandatorily referred every investigation concluding that sufficient evidence existed. However, despite the compulsory two-tier investigation, the existence of only one level of trial for acts considered the most serious and dangerous remained subject to significant criticism, as it undermined the principle of double degree of jurisdiction and thus constituted a clear infringement of the requirements of a fair trial. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdel Sattar Salem Al-Kubaisi, Guarantees of the Accused Before and During Trial, 1st ed., Al-Halabi Legal Publications, Beirut, Lebanon, 2013, p. 873.

Ramzi Riyad Awad, Judicial Oversight of the Application of Fair Trial Guarantees, Dar Al-Nahda, 2005/2006, p. 143

Official Gazette No. 14, dated 06 March 2016.

Official Gazette No. 20, dated 27 March 2017, amending and supplementing Order No. 66/155 on the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Zuleikha Tijani, Procedural System Before the Criminal Court: A Comparative Study, Dar Al-Huda, 2015, p. 270.

Khairy Ahmed El-Kabbash, Criminal Protection of Human Rights: A Comparative Study in Light of Islamic Sharia, Constitutional Principles, and International Covenants.

Khairy Ahmed El-Kabbash, Criminal Protection of Human Rights: A Comparative Study in Light of Islamic Sharia, Constitutional Principles, and International Covenants, Alexandria, 2002, p. 667.

Khairy Ahmed El-Kabbash, Ibid., p. 667.

Ahmed Hindi, The Principle of Two-Level Litigation: A Comparative Study, Dar Al-Jam‘a Al-Jadida, Alexandria, 2009, p. 27.

Ahmed Hindi, Two-Level Litigation: Its Limits and Application in Egyptian and French Law, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, undated, p. 28.

United Nations Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 32, paragraph 13, 91st Session of the General Assembly, Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Publications, November 2007, p. 88.

Decisions cited in the official documents of the General Assembly, Communication No. 307/1988, J. Camille v. Belgium, 40/48, declared on 24/03/1993, p. 280.

Article 296, as amended by Law No. 2011-939 dated August 10, 2011, concerning the participation of citizens in criminal justice and juvenile justice.

Debove Frédéric, Falletti François, and Dupic Emmanuel, Précis de droit pénal et de procédure pénale, Éditions Point Delta, 2013, p.888.

Abdel Aziz Saad, Principles of Procedures before the Criminal Court, Dar Houma, Algiers, 2008, p.157.

Farida Ben Younes, Reforming the Criminal Court in Light of Law 17/07, Journal of Legal Research and Studies, Issue 06, p.116.

Bousna Ahmed, Lectures on Reforming the Criminal Court System and the Legitimacy of Personal Conviction as the Sole Means for Issuing Judgments, Legal and Judicial Research Center, Study Day held at Judges’ Hotel on 03/10/2010, p.3.

Downloads

Published

27-02-2026

How to Cite

Annane, K. (2026). The principle of double degree of jurisdiction in Light of Criminal Procedure Law No. 25-14 as a guarantee of a fair trial. The International Tax Journal, 53(1), 731–738. Retrieved from https://internationaltaxjournal.online/index.php/itj/article/view/587

Issue

Section

Online Access