Impact of CSR regulation strengthening on corporate spending patterns: A ten-year Indian Analysis
Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, regression analysis, independent women directors, board gender diversity, Companies Act, 2013, SEBI LODR, India, fixed effectsAbstract
This study examines the role of recent regulatory changes on corporate governance and the role of CSR spending in shaping investments in both areas among firms, the new Board Governance Mandates (BGM) related to the composition of board members specific to India, and the amended Corporate Social Responsibility Regulation Act. It is focused on the ten years after the implementation of Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, requiring firms to engage in mandatory CSR outlay once certain thresholds are met. Expenditure data is available at the aggregate level for the top ten Indian companies annually per year from 2014–15 to 2023–24. Research links two major policy interventions, the mandatory CSR spend and the requirement for listed and large companies to appoint at least one independent woman director. It analyses these reforms together to determine whether improvements in board governance and greater board diversity draw CSR expenditures away from the traditional model. Using 5,348 project-level observations drawn from company-specific CSR data files, the paper first applies a pre–post analytical design around the 2019 governance inflection point. It then extends the descriptive analysis with a two-way fixed-effects specification, as reported in the source research.
Downloads
References
Agarwala, N., Pareek, R., & Sahu, T.N. (2022). Does board independence influence CSR performance? A GMM-based dynamic panel data approach. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(4), 718-734.
Aswani, J., Chidambaran, N.K., & Hasan, I. (2021). Who benefits from mandatory CSR? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100753.
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207-221.
Bhattacharya, A., & Rahman, M.L. (2019). Mandatory CSR expenditure and firm performance. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 15(3), 100160.
Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428-442.
Dharmapala, D., & Khanna, V. (2018). The impact of mandated corporate social responsibility: Evidence from India's Companies Act of 2013. International Review of Law and Economics, 56, 92-104.
DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.
Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Manchiraju, H., & Rajgopal, S. (2017). Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) create shareholder value? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(5), 1257-1300.
Mukherjee, A., Bird, R., & Duppati, G. (2018). Mandatory corporate social responsibility: The Indian experience. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 14(3), 254-265.
Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors' composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189-223.
Reddy, S., Jadhav, A., & Prasad, K. (2024). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility: evidence from India. International Journal of Business Excellence, 32(3), 380-393.
Setó-Pamies, D. (2015). The relationship between women directors and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 334-345.
Temiz, H., & Acar, M. (2023). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in different disclosure environments. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), 2247-2264.
Tuli, H., & Khosla, A. (2024). Board Gender Diversity and CSR Spending: Does Critical Mass Play Any Role in Post-Companies Act 2013? Case Of Indian-Listed Firms. Journal of Management World, 2024(4), 581-589.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The International tax journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


