Artificial intelligence in managerial decision-making: A systematic review of applications, constraints, and emerging tensions
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, managerial decision-making, AI ApplicationsAbstract
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in managerial decision making is now common practice in strategic, tactical, and operational decision making and literature on this topic is scattered over fields, industries, and decision contexts. The aim of this systematic literature review is to demonstrate how previous scientific research studies have played a part in the managerial decision-making process, its outcome, and the organizational dynamics of the process, and to highlight the remaining challenges that hinder the effective use of AI. The review focuses on the use of machine learning, predictive analytics, and decision-support systems in the past decade, based on peer-reviewed research articles, to improve forecasting accuracy, combat cognitive bias, and facilitate complex managerial judgments (Jarrahi, 2018; Davenport & Ronanki, 2018). Meanwhile, the results show persistent issues with data bias, transparency, explainability, and the excessive dependence on the algorithmic output by the manager, which hinders accountability and trust in the decisions made with the help of AI tools (Rai et al., 2019; Shrestha et al., 2021). This review builds on a thematic framework that synthesizes management, information systems, and organizational theory perspectives relating AI capabilities to decision levels and human–AI interaction modes.
Downloads
References
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
2. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 95(4), 3–11.
3. Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2017). Competing on analytics: The new science of winning. Harvard Business Review Press.
4. Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116.
5. Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human–AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007
6. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
7. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607
8. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A, 30(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354
9. Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Next-generation digital platforms: Toward human–AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), iii–ix. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13781
10. Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2021). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 63(3), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125621999607
11. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
12. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
13. Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S. J. F., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017). Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 70, 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The International tax journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


