Bridging the intention–adoption gap in climate-resilient agriculture: Evidence from hill farmers in Uttarakhand, India
Keywords:
Intention–Adoption Gap, Climate Change Adaptation, Crop Diversification, Market Accessibility, Farmer Behaviour, UttarakhandAbstract
Although farmers' awareness on climate change and policy interest in crop diversification in hill regions have been growing, the actual adoption of crop diversification among farmers in hill regions is still low. The study analyzes the behavioural readiness and actual adoption of diversification practices among the farmers in Uttarakhand in the study area. Descriptive statistics, correlation, multiple regression and logistic regression techniques are employed for analysis of primary data collected from 543 farmers. The findings show that the perception of climate change, climate knowledge, and perceived benefits are positively associated with improving diversification readiness. But these do not necessarily lead to adoption. The only variable to be statistically significant in predicting adoption behaviour is market accessibility, indicating the existence of an intention–adoption gap. The study proposes a two-stage behavioural framework in which readiness is shaped by perception and awareness, while adoption is constrained by market conditions. The results add to the literature by moving beyond the research on determinants of readiness to research on barriers to implementation and provide policy guidance for improving agricultural resilience in mountain areas.
Downloads
References
1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2. Barrett, C. B. (2008). Smallholder market participation: Concepts and evidence. Food Policy, 33(4), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.005
3. Below, T. B., Mutabazi, K. D., Kirschke, D., Franke, C., Sieber, S., Siebert, R., & Tscherning, K. (2012). Can farmers’ adaptation to climate change be explained by socio-economic household-level variables? Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 22(1), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.012
4. Birthal, P. S., Negi, D. S., & Roy, D. (2015). Diversification in Indian agriculture toward high-value crops: The role of smallholders. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 28(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104427
5. Deressa, Temesgen & Hassan, Rashid & Ringler, Claudia. (2011). Perception and adaptation to climate change by farmers in the Nile basin of Ethiopia. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 149. 23 - 31. 10.1017/S0021859610000687.
6. Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 255–298. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1153228
7. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
8. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2016). Climate-smart agriculture sourcebook. FAO.
9. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
10. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
11. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
12. Pingali, P. (2007), Agricultural growth and economic development: a view through the globalization lens. Agricultural Economics, 37: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00231.x
13. Reardon, Thomas & Timmer, C.. (2012). The Economics of the Food System Revolution. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 4. 225-264. 10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144147.
14. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
15. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
16. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The International tax journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


