Income volatility and economic insecurity among multi-platform gig workers in India: Evidence from Mumbai

Authors

  • Nilesh S. Mhatre Smt. P. N. Doshi Women’s College (Autonomous), Ghatkopar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Keywords:

Gig Economy, Gig Workers, Multi-Platform Work, Income Volatility, Job Insecurity, Financial Insecurity, Platform Workers

Abstract

The rapid growth of platform-based work in India has created new employment opportunities but has also exposed gig workers to substantial economic uncertainty. The study investigates whether gig workers’ engagement across multiple platforms represents a strategy for income diversification and risk management, or if it reflects deeper economic vulnerability. This paper examines the relationship between income volatility, job insecurity, financial insecurity and multi-platform participation among location-based platform workers in Mumbai. The study used a quantitative, comparative and cross-sectional research design through primary data collected through a structured questionnaire from 140 gig workers, i.e. 70 single-platform and 70 multi-platform workers working in food delivery, ride-hailing, quick-commerce and logistics/delivery services. Descriptive statistics, cross tabulation, chi-square tests, Welch’s t-tests and Pearson correlation were used to explore differences and associations between the two groups. The results show that workers engaged in multiple platforms experience significantly higher income volatility than workers engaged in only one platform, with average income volatility of 31.60% compared with 23.13%. Multi-platform workers also experience more job and financial insecurity. Income volatility is significantly associated with multi-platform participation (χ2 = 14.49, p < 0.001) and combined job-financial insecurity is significantly associated with multi-platform participation (χ2 = 16.46, p < 0.001).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.3

2. Adhvaryu, A., Atela, M., Brailovskaya, V., Dua, P., John, J. S., Joshi, P., & Royono, R. (2026). Platform work: Evidence from drivers in India, Indonesia, and Kenya (NBER Working Paper No. 34680). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w34680 (National Bureau of Economic Research)

3. Centre for Internet and Society. (2024). Platforming precarity: Data narratives of workers sustaining urban platform services. CIS India.

4. International Labour Organization. (2021). World employment and social outlook 2021: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. International Labour Office.

5. International Labour Organization. (2023). Extension of social protection to gig and platform workers in India. ILO India.

6. International Labour Organization. (2025). Exploring the gig economy: Challenges and opportunities. ILO. https://doi.org/10.54394/NMBW0887 (Research Repository)

7. Kuttler, T. (2025). Urban mobilities in Mumbai: Towards worker-centric platformisation beyond ‘urban solutionism’. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241264645 (Sage Journals)

8. Ministry of Finance, Government of India. (2025). Economic Survey 2024–25. Government of India.

9. Ministry of Finance, Government of India. (2026). Economic Survey 2025–26. Government of India.

10. Mourya, K. S. (2026). Income uncertainty and heterogeneous labour supply responses: The role of risk preference among gig workers in India. Anusandhanvallari, 2026(1), 928–942.

11. NITI Aayog. (2022). India's booming gig and platform economy: Perspectives and recommendations on the future of work. Government of India.

12. Palo, S., & Kumar, V. (2024). The realities behind the rides: Exploring gig workers lived experience in Mumbai. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 60(2), 175–193.

13. Rathi, A., Sekharan, A., Tandon, A., V. M., C., Furtado, C., Sekhar, N., & Devulapalli, S. (2024). Platforming precarity: Data narratives of workers sustaining urban platform services. Centre for Internet and Society, https://cis-india.org/

Downloads

Published

20-09-2026

How to Cite

Mhatre, N. S. (2026). Income volatility and economic insecurity among multi-platform gig workers in India: Evidence from Mumbai. The International Tax Journal, 53(5), 2061–2069. Retrieved from https://internationaltaxjournal.online/index.php/itj/article/view/736

Issue

Section

Online Access